Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; : 1-10, 2022 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2322300

ABSTRACT

Non-specific respiratory symptoms overlap with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Prompt diagnosis of COVID-19 in hospital employees is crucial to prevent nosocomial transmission. Rapid molecular SARS-CoV-2 testing was performed for 115 symptomatic employees. The case positivity rate was 2.6%. Employees with negative tests returned to work after 80 +/- 28 minutes.

2.
Drugs Context ; 122023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2265695

ABSTRACT

Background: Antibiotics are prescribed to nearly one-half of patients with viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) in outpatient settings. This use is ineffective and may cause undue harm and excess cost from unnecessary antibiotic exposure. We implemented a multifaceted intervention to address inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral RTI. Here, we discuss the impact over 4 years, before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: This observational study describes the implementation and initial impact of a multimodal stewardship intervention on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral RTIs in outpatient care settings at a single centre. We tracked the rate of visits for viral RTI as well as antibiotic prescribing for viral RTIs in urgent care, primary care and the emergency department between January 2018 and March 2022. Data were collected 1 year prior to implementation and 3 years after implementation. The primary outcome - the rate of inappropriate antibiotics prescribed for viral RTIs - was described by calendar year (CY) to review changes after the stewardship intervention. Results: In CY2018, the year prior to implementation of targeted RTI antimicrobial stewardship, the rate of inappropriate RTI antibiotics prescribed was 10% in urgent care, 11% in primary care and 18% in the emergency department (ED). During the first CY of the intervention, rates were 8% in urgent care, 10% in primary care and 16% in the ED. In CY2020, the second year of the intervention, inappropriate RTI antibiotics were prescribed in 5% of urgent care and 3% primary care RTI visits and 15% of ED RTI visits. These rates were similar in CY2021 and the first 3 months of CY2022. Over 30,000 visits for RTIs were seen annually in CY2018 and CY2019. Annual RTI visits dropped to 20,222 in CY2020 and 14,172 in CY2021. Conclusion: Although total visits for non-COVID RTIs decreased by approximately 50% during the first 2 years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, an antimicrobial stewardship intervention was associated with decreases in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for RTIs. This was maintained throughout 2 years of the pandemic.This article is part of the Antibiotic stewardship Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/antimicrobial-stewardship-a-focus-on-the-need-for-moderation.

3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(6): 1089-1092, 2022 03 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1703666

ABSTRACT

Across 20 vaccine breakthrough cases detected at our institution, all 20 (100%) infections were due to variants of concern (VOCs) and had a median Ct of 20.2 (IQR, 17.1-23.3). When compared with 5174 contemporaneous samples sequenced in our laboratory, VOCs were significantly enriched among breakthrough infections (P < .05).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Base Sequence , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Washington/epidemiology
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(9): e0098921, 2021 08 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1501532

ABSTRACT

With the availability of widespread SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, high-throughput quantitative anti-spike protein serological testing will likely become increasingly important. Here, we investigated the performance characteristics of the recently FDA-authorized semiquantitative anti-spike protein AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay compared to the FDA-authorized anti-nucleocapsid protein Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2-S, EuroImmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and GenScript surrogate virus neutralization assays and examined the humoral response associated with vaccination, natural protection, and vaccine breakthrough infection. The AdviseDx assay had a clinical sensitivity at 14 days after symptom onset or 10 days after PCR detection of 95.6% (65/68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.8 to 98.8%), with two discrepant individuals seroconverting shortly thereafter. The AdviseDx assay demonstrated 100% positive percent agreement with the four other assays examined using the same symptom onset or PCR detection cutoffs. Using a recently available WHO international standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody, we provide assay unit conversion factors to international units for each of the assays examined. We performed a longitudinal survey of healthy vaccinated individuals, finding that median AdviseDx immunoglobulin levels peaked 7 weeks after first vaccine dose at approximately 4,000 IU/ml. Intriguingly, among the five assays examined, there was no significant difference in antigen binding level or neutralizing activity between two seropositive patients protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a previously described fishing vessel outbreak and five health care workers who experienced vaccine breakthrough of SARS-CoV-2 infection, all with variants of concern. These findings suggest that protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection cannot currently be predicted exclusively using in vitro antibody assays against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike. Further work is required to establish protective correlates for SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(10): 1167-1175, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1348262

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has a widely variable clinical syndrome that is difficult to distinguish from bacterial sepsis, leading to high rates of antibiotic use. Early studies indicate low rates of secondary bacterial infections (SBIs) but have included heterogeneous patient populations. Here, we catalogue all SBIs and antibiotic prescription practices in a population of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with COVID-19 ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation from 3 Seattle, Washington hospitals in 2020. Data were obtained via electronic and manual review of the electronic medical record. We report the incidence and site of SBIs, mortality, and antibiotics per day using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We identified 126 patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS during the study period. Of these patients, 61% developed clinical infection confirmed by bacterial culture. Ventilator associated pneumonia was confirmed in 55% of patients, bacteremia in 20%, and urinary tract infection (UTI) in 17%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated bacterial species. A total of 97% of patients received antibiotics during their hospitalization, and patients received nearly one antibiotic per day during their hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS are at high risk for secondary bacterial infections and have extensive antibiotic exposure.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/chemically induced , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(16): 2211-2214, 2020 11 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1153136

ABSTRACT

Thousands of people in the United States have required testing for SARS-CoV-2. Evaluation for a special pathogen is resource intensive. We report an innovative approach to home assessment that, in collaboration with public health, enables safe evaluation and specimen collection outside the healthcare setting, avoiding unnecessary exposures and resource utilization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , House Calls , Patient Care Team , Public Health/methods , Specimen Handling/methods , COVID-19/prevention & control , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , United States
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(10): 2702-2707, 2020 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059704

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) who serve on the front lines of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been at increased risk for infection due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in some settings. Healthcare-acquired infection has been reported in similar epidemics, but there are limited data on the prevalence of COVID-19 among HCWs and their associated clinical outcomes in the United States. METHODS: We established 2 high-throughput employee testing centers in Seattle, Washington, with drive-through and walk-through options for symptomatic employees in the University of Washington Medicine system and its affiliated organizations. Using data from these testing centers, we report the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among symptomatic employees and describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes among employees with COVID-19. RESULTS: Between 12 March 2020 and 23 April 2020, 3477 symptomatic employees were tested for COVID-19 at 2 employee testing centers; 185 (5.3%) employees tested positive for COVID-19. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was similar when comparing frontline HCWs (5.2%) with nonfrontline staff (5.5%). Among 174 positive employees reached for follow-up at least 14 days after diagnosis, 6 reported COVID-related hospitalization; all recovered. CONCLUSIONS: During the study period, we observed that the prevalence of positive SARS-CoV-2 tests among symptomatic HCWs was comparable to that of symptomatic nonfrontline staff. Reliable and rapid access to testing for employees is essential to preserve the health, safety, and availability of the healthcare workforce during this pandemic and to facilitate the rapid return of SARS-CoV-2-negative employees to work.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Health Personnel , Humans , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Washington/epidemiology
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(2): 323-326, 2021 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1050128

ABSTRACT

Using data for 20 912 patients from 2 large academic health systems, we analyzed the frequency of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test discordance among individuals initially testing negative by nasopharyngeal swab who were retested on clinical grounds within 7 days. The frequency of subsequent positivity within this window was 3.5% and was similar across institutions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
10.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(10): ofaa435, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-889583

ABSTRACT

Concerns about severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 exposure in health care settings may cause patients to delay care. Among 2992 patients testing negative on admission to an academic, 3-hospital system, 8 tested positive during hospitalization or within 14 days postdischarge. Following adjudication of each instance, health care-associated infection incidence ranged from 0.8 to 5.0 cases per 10 000 patient-days.

11.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 78(7): 1136-1146, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-133480

ABSTRACT

The emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 (SC2) virus, in late December 2019 has placed an overwhelming strain on healthcare institutions nationwide. The modern healthcare system has never managed a pandemic of this magnitude, the ramifications of which will undoubtedly lead to lasting changes in policy and protocol development for viral testing guidelines, personal protective equipment (PPE), surgical scheduling, and residency education and training. The State of Washington had the first reported case and death related to COVID-19 in the United States. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons have a unique risk of exposure to SC2 and developing COVID-19 because of our proximity of working in and around the oropharynx and nasopharynx. The present report has summarized the evolution of COVID-19 guidelines in 4 key areas: 1) preoperative SC2 testing; 2) PPE stewardship; 3) surgical scheduling guidelines; and 4) resident education and training for oral and maxillofacial surgery at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Patient Care/standards , Pneumonia, Viral , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surgery, Oral/organization & administration , Appointments and Schedules , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Internship and Residency , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Washington
12.
Acad Med ; 95(8): 1146-1148, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-54981

ABSTRACT

On January 19, 2020, the first case of a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States was reported in Washington State. On February 29, 2020, a patient infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) passed away in a hospital in Seattle-King County, the first reported COVID-19-related death in the United States. That same day, a skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility in the county reported that several of its residents tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and that many staff had symptoms compatible with COVID-19.The University of Washington Medicine health system (UW Medicine), which is based in Seattle-King County and provides quaternary care for the region, was one of several health care organizations called upon to address this growing crisis. What ensued was a series of swiftly enacted decisions and activities at UW Medicine, in partnership with local, state, and national public health agencies, to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Tapping into the multipronged mission areas of academic medicine, UW Medicine worked to support the community, innovate in science and clinical practice; lead policy and practice guideline development; and adopt changes as the crisis unfolded. In doing so, health system leaders had to balance their commitments to students, residents and fellows, researchers, faculty, staff, and hospital and health center entities, while ensuring that patients continued to receive cutting-edge, high-quality, safe care. In this Invited Commentary, the authors highlight the work and challenges UW Medicine has faced in responding to the global COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , Washington/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL